How to get free YouTube subscribers, likes and views?
Get Free YouTube Subscribers, Views and Likes

CBSA: Canada's Border Service under Scrutiny over ArriveCAN Controversy

Follow
this guys garage

Description Meeting No. 101 OGGO Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates
Location West Block 025B
Scheduled
Monday, Feb 5, 2024
11:01 13:00
1 Hour 58 Minutes
Actual https://parlvu.parl.gc.ca/Harmony/en/...
Monday, Feb 5, 2024
11:01
Contact
Information
[email protected]
Information website
Introduction:

The Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) is currently facing a significant public backlash and scrutiny over its handling of the ArriveCAN app, which has sparked concerns regarding the protection of Canadians' privacy rights. As the agency responsible for safeguarding Canada's borders and managing the flow of people and goods, the CBSA's recent controversy has raised questions about its ability to strike a balance between border security and citizen privacy.

Background:

In an effort to manage the COVID19 pandemic and ensure public safety, the Canadian government introduced the ArriveCAN app in 2020. The app allows travelers entering Canada to submit their mandatory travel and contact information, including potential COVID19 symptoms, quarantine plans, and vaccination status. Originally positioned as a tool to streamline processing during the pandemic, the app quickly became a point of contention.

Controversy:

The CBSA faced fierce criticism after it was revealed that the agency accessed and potentially shared the personal data of travelers collected through the ArriveCAN app with other federal agencies. Privacy advocates argue that the CBSA's actions violate Canadians' privacy rights, calling into question the agency's commitment to upholding privacy laws and protocols.

The controversy surrounding the CBSA primarily centers around two key issues:

1. Data Sharing: Reports emerged suggesting that the CBSA has been sharing the personal information collected through ArriveCAN with other government bodies without the explicit consent of travelers. This raised concerns about potential misuse of sensitive data and the lack of transparency regarding how the data is being handled and protected.

2. Surveillance Concerns: Critics argue that the CBSA's access to personal data through ArriveCAN raises concerns about increased surveillance and potential profiling of individuals. Privacy advocates worry that the collection and sharing of private information could pave the way for unwanted surveillance practices, infringing upon individuals' right to privacy.

Public and Governmental Response:

These revelations have created a significant public outcry, with many Canadians expressing their concern regarding the handling and potential misuse of their personal information. As a result, several privacy advocacy groups have launched legal challenges against the CBSA, seeking clarity and accountability in terms of data protection.

In response to the controversy, the CBSA issued a statement acknowledging the datasharing practices and stating their commitment to privacy protection. The agency has promised to review its protocols and data handling practices to address public concerns.

However, the incident has also sparked wider discussions about the need for enhanced oversight mechanisms and stricter regulations to ensure that personal data collected by government agencies are used responsibly and solely for the purposes for which they were gathered.

Conclusion:

The CBSA's recent controversy surrounding the ArriveCAN app has highlighted the delicate balance between safeguarding public safety and protecting individuals' privacy rights. As Canadians increasingly rely on digital tools for various aspects of their lives, it is crucial that government agencies like the CBSA prioritize transparency, clear data handling guidelines, and robust privacy safeguards to maintain citizens' trust while upholding their core duties of border security.

The fair dealing exception in the Copyright Act allows you to use other people's copyright protected material for the purpose of research, private study, education, satire, parody, criticism, review or news reporting, provided that what you do with the work is 'fair'.

posted by Itamarpw