YouTube doesn't want you know this subscribers secret
Get Free YouTube Subscribers, Views and Likes

New York Times Co. v. United States Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Follow
Quimbee

Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/casebriefso...

New York Times Co. v. United States | 403 U.S. 713 (1971)

There are virtually no constitutional absolutes. But the First Amendment’s prohibition against prior restraints of the press comes close to being one. Are prior restraints ever permissible? The splintered United States Supreme Court addressed this issue in New York Times versus United States.

Daniel Ellsberg helped author a topsecret government study, informally called the Pentagon Papers, that contained embarrassing information about the government’s involvement in the ongoing Vietnam War. In 1971, he leaked portions of the report to the New York Times and Washington Post. After the newspapers published articles based on the leaked portions and indicated more articles were forthcoming, the Justice Department filed lawsuits in federal district courts in New York and Washington, D.C., seeking injunctions against publication of further articles based on certain portions of the leaked material. The government offered no proof that future articles would cause a break in diplomatic relations with any country or a new military conflict or would compromise military or intelligence operations. Rather, the government merely tried to prove that the articles would interfere with the State Department’s negotiations concerning the war’s end and generally embarrass its diplomatic efforts.

The two district courts denied preliminary injunctions, and the government appealed. The D.C. Circuit affirmed the district court’s order, but the Second Circuit entered a temporary restraining order and remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

The New York Times successfully petitioned the United States Supreme Court to review the case before judgment in the Second Circuit, while the United States successfully petitioned the Court to review the D.C. Circuit’s judgment. The Supreme Court consolidated the cases.

Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/newyor...

The Quimbee App features over 16,300 case briefs keyed to 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► https://www.quimbee.com/casebriefso...

Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/newyor...

Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_...
Quimbee Case Brief App ► https://www.quimbee.com/casebriefso...
Facebook ►   / quimbeedotcom  
Twitter ►   / quimbeedotcom  
#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries

posted by bargennerec