An explanation of the Bottleneck Fallacy, also called the single source fallacy for the strength of support for inductive arguments.

Sponsors: NBA_Ruby, Antybodi, Federico Galvão, Mike Gloudemans, Andrew Sullivan, Eugene SY, Tyler James, Antoinemp1, Dennis Sexton, Joao Sa, Joshua Furman, Multitude, Ploney, Avatar, Diéssica, GhostlyYorick, Hendrick McDonald, horace chan, Will DeRousse, Star Gazer, Paul Linkogle, Julian Seidl, Doǧan Çetin, and Daniel West. Thanks for your support on Patreon! If you want to become a patron, follow this link:   / carneades  

Here are some videos you might enjoy:
The 100 Days of Logic (   • 100 Days of Logic (Full)  )
History of Philosophy (   • Four Weeks of Famous Philosophers  )
Ancient Philosophers & Zeno’s Paradoxes (   • Schools of Ancient Greek Philosophy  )
ExPhi Experimental Philosophy (   / @experimentalphilosophyexphi  )
Map of Philosophy (   • The Map Of Philosophy  )
More videos with Carneades (   / @carneadesofcyrene  )

Philosophy by Topic:
Epistemology:    • Epistemology  
Metaphysics:    • Metaphysics  
Political Philosophy:    • Political Philosophy  
Philosophy of Religion:    • Philosophy of Religion  
Ancient Philosophy:    • Ancient Philosophy  
Philosophy of Science:    • Philosophy of Science  
Philosophy of Language:    • Philosophy of Language  
Philosophy of Art/Aesthetics:    • Philosophy of Art (Aesthetics)  


Buy stuff with Zazzle: https://www.zazzle.com/store/carneade...

Follow us on Twitter: @CarneadesCyrene   / carneadescyrene  

Information for this video gathered from The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, The CollierMacMillan Encyclopedia of Philosophy, the Dictionary of Continental Philosophy, and more!